Preprint / Version 1

Molecular mechanism of the catalysis for U12-type splicing by the human minor spliceosome

This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review.

Authors

Categories
Keywords
RNA splicing; U12-type intron; minor spliceosome; splicing catalysis; branching; exon ligation; ATPase

Abstract

Precursor messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing is a central process in eukaryotic gene expression. Among the introns removed, the rare but essential U12-type introns are excised by the minor spliceosome, which in most multicellular eukaryotes constitutes a rate-limiting step with distinct regulatory potential. Despite its critical role, the catalytic mechanism of this distinctive spliceosome remains largely unknown. Here we report the isolation and structure determination of two catalytic states of the human minor spliceosome: the branching-completed C complex and the exon-ligation-ready C* complex. These two cryo-EM structures, at average resolutions of 2.9-3.0 Å, reveal the configuration of key RNA elements and the positions of catalytic metals at the splicing active site. The U12-type catalysis is safeguarded by splicing factors that are unique to the minor spliceosome: MMTAG2 facilitates the stabilization of the branch point sequence (BPS)/U12 duplex to promote branching reaction (step-I); WDR25 and FAM204A orient the BPS/U12 duplex to dock the 3′ splice site (3′SS) for exon-ligation (step-II); RBM41 assists spliceosome binding of the helicase PRP22 to prepare for the mRNA release. These findings reveal catalytic principles of the U12-type splicing and establish new molecular links to development and diseases.

References

1 Berget, S. M., Moore, C. & Sharp, P. A. Spliced segments at the 5' terminus of adenovirus 2 late mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74, 3171-3175 (1977). https://doi.org:10.1073/pnas.74.8.3171

2 Chow, L. T., Gelinas, R. E., Broker, T. R. & Roberts, R. J. An amazing sequence arrangement at the 5' ends of adenovirus 2 messenger RNA. Cell 12, 1-8 (1977). https://doi.org:10.1016/0092-8674(77)90180-5

3 Wright, C. J., Smith, C. W. J. & Jiggins, C. D. Alternative splicing as a source of phenotypic diversity. Nat Rev Genet 23, 697-710 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41576-022-00514-4

4 Rogalska, M. E., Vivori, C. & Valcarcel, J. Regulation of pre-mRNA splicing: roles in physiology and disease, and therapeutic prospects. Nat Rev Genet 24, 251-269 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41576-022-00556-8

5 Yan, C., Wan, R. & Shi, Y. Molecular Mechanisms of pre-mRNA Splicing through Structural Biology of the Spliceosome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 11 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1101/cshperspect.a032409

6 Patel, A. A. & Steitz, J. A. Splicing double: insights from the second spliceosome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4, 960-970 (2003). https://doi.org:10.1038/nrm1259

7 Sharp, P. A. & Burge, C. B. Classification of introns: U2-type or U12-type. Cell 91, 875-879 (1997). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80479-1

8 Will, C. L. & Luhrmann, R. Splicing of a rare class of introns by the U12-dependent spliceosome. Biol Chem 386, 713-724 (2005). https://doi.org:10.1515/BC.2005.084

9 Turunen, J. J., Niemela, E. H., Verma, B. & Frilander, M. J. The significant other: splicing by the minor spliceosome. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 4, 61-76 (2013). https://doi.org:10.1002/wrna.1141

10 Patel, A. A., McCarthy, M. & Steitz, J. A. The splicing of U12-type introns can be a rate-limiting step in gene expression. EMBO J 21, 3804-3815 (2002). https://doi.org:10.1093/emboj/cdf297

11 Hall, S. L. & Padgett, R. A. Requirement of U12 snRNA for in vivo splicing of a minor class of eukaryotic nuclear pre-mRNA introns. Science 271, 1716-1718 (1996). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.271.5256.1716

12 Tarn, W. Y. & Steitz, J. A. A novel spliceosome containing U11, U12, and U5 snRNPs excises a minor class (AT-AC) intron in vitro. Cell 84, 801-811 (1996). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81057-0

13 Tarn, W. Y. & Steitz, J. A. Highly diverged U4 and U6 small nuclear RNAs required for splicing rare AT-AC introns. Science 273, 1824-1832 (1996). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.273.5283.1824

14 Tarn, W. Y. & Steitz, J. A. Pre-mRNA splicing: the discovery of a new spliceosome doubles the challenge. Trends Biochem Sci 22, 132-137 (1997). https://doi.org:10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01018-9

15 Alioto, T. S. U12DB: a database of orthologous U12-type spliceosomal introns. Nucleic Acids Res 35, D110-115 (2007). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkl796

16 Olthof, A. M., Hyatt, K. C. & Kanadia, R. N. Minor intron splicing revisited: identification of new minor intron-containing genes and tissue-dependent retention and alternative splicing of minor introns. BMC Genomics 20, 686 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1186/s12864-019-6046-x

17 Olthof, A. M. et al. Taxonomy of introns and the evolution of minor introns. Nucleic Acids Res 52, 9247-9266 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkae550

18 Yu, Y.-T., Scharl, E.C., Smith, C.M., and Steitz, J.A. The growing world of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. 487–524 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1999).

19 Will, C. L. et al. The human 18S U11/U12 snRNP contains a set of novel proteins not found in the U2-dependent spliceosome. RNA 10, 929-941 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1261/rna.7320604

20 Bai, R. et al. Structural basis of U12-type intron engagement by the fully assembled human minor spliceosome. Science 383, 1245-1252 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.adn7272

21 Bai, R. et al. Structure of the activated human minor spliceosome. Science 371, eabg0879 (2021). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.abg0879

22 Bai, F. et al. RNA Binding Motif Protein 48 Is Required for U12 Splicing and Maize Endosperm Differentiation. Plant Cell 31, 715-733 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1105/tpc.18.00754

23 Zuo, Y., Feng, F., Qi, W. & Song, R. Dek42 encodes an RNA-binding protein that affects alternative pre-mRNA splicing and maize kernel development. J Integr Plant Biol 61, 728-748 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1111/jipb.12798

24 de Wolf, B. et al. Chromosomal instability by mutations in the novel minor spliceosome component CENATAC. EMBO J 40, e106536 (2021). https://doi.org:10.15252/embj.2020106536

25 Suzuki, T. et al. The DROL1 subunit of U5 snRNP in the spliceosome is specifically required to splice AT-AC-type introns in Arabidopsis. Plant J 109, 633-648 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1111/tpj.15582

26 Zhao, J., Peter, D., Brandina, I., Liu, X. & Galej, W. P. Structural basis of 5' splice site recognition by the minor spliceosome. Mol Cell 85, 652-664 e654 (2025). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.12.017

27 Bertram, K. et al. Structural Insights into the Roles of Metazoan-Specific Splicing Factors in the Human Step 1 Spliceosome. Mol Cell 80, 127-139 e126 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.09.012

28 Bertram, K. et al. Cryo-EM structure of a human spliceosome activated for step 2 of splicing. Nature 542, 318-323 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1038/nature21079

29 Tian, J. Y. et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of tumor-associated gene hMMTAG2 from human multiple myeloma cell line ARH-77. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai) 35, 143-148 (2003).

30 Townsend, C. et al. Mechanism of protein-guided folding of the active site U2/U6 RNA during spliceosome activation. Science 370 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.abc3753

31 Wan, R., Bai, R., Zhan, X. & Shi, Y. How Is Precursor Messenger RNA Spliced by the Spliceosome? Annu Rev Biochem 89, 333-358 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111024

32 Dybkov, O. et al. Regulation of 3' splice site selection after step 1 of splicing by spliceosomal C* proteins. Sci Adv 9, eadf1785 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1126/sciadv.adf1785

33 Zhan, X., Lu, Y. & Shi, Y. Molecular basis for the activation of human spliceosome. Nat Commun 15, 6348 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-024-50785-0

34 Marcia, M. & Pyle, A. M. Visualizing group II intron catalysis through the stages of splicing. Cell 151, 497-507 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.033

35 Zhang, X. et al. An Atomic Structure of the Human Spliceosome. Cell 169, 918-929 e914 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.033

36 Luo, S. Q. et al. C1orf35 contributes to tumorigenesis by activating c-MYC transcription in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 39, 3354-3366 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41388-020-1222-7

37 Meier, T., Timm, M., Montani, M. & Wilkens, L. Gene networks and transcriptional regulators associated with liver cancer development and progression. BMC Med Genomics 14, 41 (2021). https://doi.org:10.1186/s12920-021-00883-5

38 Zhan, X., Yan, C., Zhang, X., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structure of a human catalytic step I spliceosome. Science 359, 537-545 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aar6401

39 Uhlen, M. et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 357 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aan2507

40 Nguyen, T. H. D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the yeast U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP at 3.7 A resolution. Nature 530, 298-302 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1038/nature16940

41 Bai, R. et al. Mechanism of spliceosome remodeling by the ATPase/helicase Prp2 and its coactivator Spp2. Science 371 (2021). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.abe8863

42 Garbers, T. B., Enders, M., Neumann, P. & Ficner, R. Crystal structure of Prp16 in complex with ADP. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 79, 200-207 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1107/S2053230X23005721

43 Felisberto-Rodrigues, C. et al. Structural and functional characterisation of human RNA helicase DHX8 provides insights into the mechanism of RNA-stimulated ADP release. Biochem J 476, 2521-2543 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1042/BCJ20190383

44 Hamann, F., Enders, M. & Ficner, R. Structural basis for RNA translocation by DEAH-box ATPases. Nucleic Acids Res 47, 4349-4362 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkz150

45 Norppa, A. J. et al. Distinct functions for the paralogous RBM41 and U11/U12-65K proteins in the minor spliceosome. Nucleic Acids Res 52, 4037-4052 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkae070

46 Hang, J., Wan, R., Yan, C. & Shi, Y. Structural basis of pre-mRNA splicing. Science 349, 1191-1198 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aac8159

47 Norppa, A. J., Shcherbii, M. V. & Frilander, M. J. Connecting genotype and phenotype in minor spliceosome diseases. RNA 31, 284-299 (2025). https://doi.org:10.1261/rna.080337.124

48 Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci 27, 14-25 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1002/pro.3235

49 Wu, Q. & Krainer, A. R. Purine-rich enhancers function in the AT-AC pre-mRNA splicing pathway and do so independently of intact U1 snRNP. Rna 4, 1664-1673 (1998). https://doi.org:Doi 10.1017/S1355838298981432

50 Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M. & Roeder, R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 11, 1475-1489 (1983). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/11.5.1475

51 Bai, R. et al. Mechanism of spliceosome remodeling by the ATPase/helicase Prp2 and its coactivator Spp2. Science (2020). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.abe8863

52 Bai, R., Yan, C., Wan, R., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structure of the Post-catalytic Spliceosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 171, 1589-1598 e1588 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.038

53 Zhu, T. et al. DPHL: A DIA Pan-human Protein Mass Spectrometry Library for Robust Biomarker Discovery. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 18, 104-119 (2020). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.11.008

54 Wang, L. H. et al. pFind 2.0: a software package for peptide and protein identification via tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21, 2985-2991 (2007). https://doi.org:10.1002/rcm.3173

55 Bai, R., Wan, R., Yan, C., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structures of the fully assembled Saccharomyces cerevisiae spliceosome before activation. Science 360, 1423-1429 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aau0325

56 Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Methods 14, 331-332 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1038/nmeth.4193

57 Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat Methods 16, 1153-1160 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41592-019-0575-8

58 Zhang, X. et al. Structures of the human spliceosomes before and after release of the ligated exon. Cell Res 29, 274-285 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41422-019-0143-x

59 Agafonov, D. E. et al. Molecular architecture of the human U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP. Science 351, 1416-1420 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1126/science.aad2085

60 Zhu, J. et al. A minority of final stacks yields superior amplitude in single-particle cryo-EM. Nat Commun 14, 7822 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-023-43555-x

61 Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24-35 (2013). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.004

62 Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J Mol Biol 333, 721-745 (2003). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013

63 Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2126-2132 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1107/S0907444904019158

64 Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25, 1605-1612 (2004). https://doi.org:10.1002/jcc.20084

65 Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583-589 (2021). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

66 Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493-500 (2024). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w

67 Xu, K., Wang, Z., Shi, J. P., Li, H. S. & Zhang, Q. C. A(2)-Net: Molecular Structure Estimation from Cryo-EM Density Volumes. Thirty-Third Aaai Conference on Artificial Intelligence / Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference / Ninth Aaai Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 1230-1237 (2019).

68 Zhou, L. et al. Crystal structures of the Lsm complex bound to the 3' end sequence of U6 small nuclear RNA. Nature 506, 116-120 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1038/nature12803

69 Wang, W. et al. trRosettaRNA: automated prediction of RNA 3D structure with transformer network. Nat Commun 14, 7266 (2023). https://doi.org:10.1038/s41467-023-42528-4

70 Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 74, 531-544 (2018). https://doi.org:10.1107/S2059798318006551

71 Davis, I. W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 35, W375-383 (2007). https://doi.org:10.1093/nar/gkm216

Metrics

Favorites: 3
Views: 54
Downloads: 16

Downloads

Additional Files

Supplemental File(s)

Posted

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Bai, R., Guo, H., Sun, R., Zhu, Y., Shi, Y., & Wan, R. (2026). Molecular mechanism of the catalysis for U12-type splicing by the human minor spliceosome. LangTaoSha Preprint Server. https://doi.org/10.65215/LTSpreprints.2026.04.24.000201

Download Citation

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests to disclose.