Distinct C-tail dynamics between β-arrestin isoforms in forming GPCR tail- and core-engaged complexes
Abstract
The two non-visual β-arrestins (βarrs) are essential scaffolding proteins involved in desensitization, internalization and signaling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and they show functional divergence despite high structural similarity. By employing NMR, cryo-EM and computational methods, we herein report previously unanticipated differences between the two isoforms in the basal and both the receptor tail- and core-engaged states. The autoinhibitory C-tails of the two βarrs show distinct dynamics in the basal state, and only that of βarr2 robustly transitions into an α-helix that docks at the central crest in the tail-engaged state. This difference is encoded in the amino acid sequences of the disordered regions flanking the chameleon motif. Moreover, core interaction releases βarr2 C-tail, and the core-engaged complex structures determined in lipid nanodiscs reveal a less tilted binding angle of βarr2 due to a shallower insertion of its C-edge loops into the membrane. Our findings provide a conceptual molecular framework for understanding the functional divergence between the βarr isoforms in regulating GPCR signaling.
References
1. Weis, W. I. & Kobilka, B. K. The molecular basis of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 897–919 (2018).
2. DeWire, S. M., Ahn, S., Lefkowitz, R. J. & Shenoy, S. K. Beta-arrestins and cell signaling. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69, 483–510 (2007).
3. Hilger, D., Masureel, M. & Kobilka, B. K. Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 4–12 (2018).
4. Shukla, A. K. et al. Visualization of arrestin recruitment by a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 512, 218–222 (2014).
5. Cahill, T. J. et al. Distinct conformations of GPCR-β-arrestin complexes mediate desensitization, signaling, and endocytosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2562–2567 (2017).
6. Kohout, T. A., Lin, F. S., Perry, S. J., Conner, D. A. & Lefkowitz, R. J. beta-Arrestin 1 and 2 differentially regulate heptahelical receptor signaling and trafficking. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1601–1606 (2001).
7. Ahn, S., Nelson, C. D., Garrison, T. R., Miller, W. E. & Lefkowitz, R. J. Desensitization, internalization, and signaling functions of beta-arrestins demonstrated by RNA interference. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1740–1744 (2003).
8. Ahn, S., Wei, H., Garrison, T. R. & Lefkowitz, R. J. Reciprocal regulation of angiotensin receptor-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases by beta-arrestins 1 and 2. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 7807–7811 (2004).
9. Srivastava, A., Gupta, B., Gupta, C. & Shukla, A. K. Emerging functional divergence of beta-arrestin isoforms in GPCR function. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 26, 628–642 (2015).
10. Yin, W. et al. A complex structure of arrestin-2 bound to a G protein-coupled receptor. Cell Res. 29, 971–983 (2019).
11. Huang, W. et al. Structure of the neurotensin receptor 1 in complex with β-arrestin 1. Nature 579, 303–308 (2020).
12. Lee, Y. et al. Molecular basis of β-arrestin coupling to formoterol-bound β1-adrenoceptor. Nature 583, 862–866 (2020).
13. Staus, D. P. et al. Structure of the M2 muscarinic receptor-β-arrestin complex in a lipid nanodisc. Nature 579, 297–302 (2020).
14. Bous, J. et al. Structure of the vasopressin hormone-V2 receptor-β-arrestin1 ternary complex. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo7761 (2022).
15. Cao, C. et al. Signaling snapshots of a serotonin receptor activated by the prototypical psychedelic LSD. Neuron 110, 3154–3167.e7 (2022).
16. Liao, Y.-Y. et al. Snapshot of the cannabinoid receptor 1-arrestin complex unravels the biased signaling mechanism. Cell 186, 5784–5797.e17 (2023).
17. Zhang, H. et al. The molecular basis of μ-opioid receptor signaling plasticity. Cell Res. 35, 1021–1036 (2025).
18. Chen, K. et al. Tail engagement of arrestin at the glucagon receptor. Nature 620, 904–910 (2023).
19. Cai, H. et al. Noncanonical agonist-dependent and -independent arrestin recruitment of GPR1. Science 390, eadt8794 (2025).
20. Chen, Q. et al. Effect of phosphorylation barcodes on arrestin binding to a chemokine receptor. Nature 643, 280–287 (2025).
21. Zhai, R. et al. Distinct activation mechanisms of β-arrestin-1 revealed by 19F NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 14, 7865 (2023).
22. Cassier, E. et al. Phosphorylation of β-arrestin2 at Thr383 by MEK underlies β-arrestin-dependent activation of Erk1/2 by GPCRs. eLife 6, e23777 (2017).
23. Asher, W. B. et al. GPCR-mediated β-arrestin activation deconvoluted with single-molecule precision. Cell 185, 1661–1675.e16 (2022).
24. Gurevich, V. V. & Gurevich, E. V. GPCR-dependent and -independent arrestin signaling. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 45, 639–650 (2024).
25. Petrovic, I. et al. A high-resolution analysis of arrestin2 interactions responsible for CCR5 endocytosis. eLife 14, RP106839 (2026).
26. Maharana, J. et al. Molecular insights into atypical modes of β-arrestin interaction with seven transmembrane receptors. Science 383, 101–108 (2024).
27. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
28. Grimes, J. et al. Plasma membrane preassociation drives β-arrestin coupling to receptors and activation. Cell 186, 2238–2255.e20 (2023).
29. Gomes, A. A. S. et al. Lipids modulate the dynamics of GPCR:β-arrestin interaction. Nat. Commun. 16, 4982 (2025).
30. Killeen, T. D. et al. Distinct membrane binding properties of the two non-visual arrestins. Commun. Biol. 9, 150 (2026).
31. Rasmussen, S. G. F. et al. Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature 477, 549–555 (2011).
32. Liu, J. J., Horst, R., Katritch, V., Stevens, R. C. & Wüthrich, K. Biased signaling pathways in beta2-adrenergic receptor characterized by 19F-NMR. Science 335, 1106–1110 (2012).
33. Suomivuori, C.-M. et al. Molecular mechanism of biased signaling in a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor. Science 367, 881–887 (2020).
34. Qu, Q. et al. Insights into distinct signaling profiles of the µOR activated by diverse agonists. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 423–430 (2023).
35. Rangari, V. A. et al. A cryptic pocket in CB1 drives peripheral and functional selectivity. Nature 640, 265–273 (2025).
36. Chen, Q. et al. An Eight amino acid segment controls oligomerization and preferred conformation of the two non-visual arrestins. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166790 (2021).
37. Haider, R. S. et al. β-arrestin1 and 2 exhibit distinct phosphorylation-dependent conformations when coupling to the same GPCR in living cells. Nat. Commun. 13, 5638 (2022).
38. Oakley, R. H., Laporte, S. A., Holt, J. A., Caron, M. G. & Barak, L. S. Differential affinities of visual arrestin, beta arrestin1, and beta arrestin2 for G protein-coupled receptors delineate two major classes of receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17201–17210 (2000).
39. O'Hayre, M. et al. Genetic evidence that β-arrestins are dispensable for the initiation of β2-adrenergic receptor signaling to ERK. Sci. Signal. 10, eaal3395 (2017).
40. Luttrell, L. M. et al. Activation and targeting of extracellular signal-regulated kinases by beta-arrestin scaffolds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2449–2454 (2001).
41. Kahsai, A. W. et al. Signal transduction at GPCRs: Allosteric activation of the ERK MAPK by β-arrestin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303794120 (2023).
42. Laporte, S. A., Miller, W. E., Kim, K.-M. & Caron, M. G. beta-Arrestin/AP-2 interaction in G protein-coupled receptor internalization: identification of a beta-arrestin binding site in beta 2-adaptin. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 9247–9254 (2002).
43. Kim, Y.-M. & Benovic, J. L. Differential roles of arrestin-2 interaction with clathrin and adaptor protein 2 in G protein-coupled receptor trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 30760–30768 (2002).
44. Schmid, E. M. et al. Role of the AP2 beta-appendage hub in recruiting partners for clathrin-coated vesicle assembly. PLoS Biol. 4, e262 (2006).
45. Kang, D. S. et al. Structure of an arrestin2-clathrin complex reveals a novel clathrin binding domain that modulates receptor trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 29860–29872 (2009).
46. Thomsen, A. R. B. et al. GPCR-G protein-β-arrestin super-complex mediates sustained G protein signaling. Cell 166, 907–919 (2016).
47. He, G. et al. A GPCR-G protein-β-arrestin megacomplex enabled by a versatile allosteric modulator. Cell 189, 1434–1450.e22 (2026).
48. Carpenter, B. & Tate, C. G. Expression and purification of mini G proteins from Escherichia coli. Bio Protoc. 7, e2235 (2017).
49. Nguyen, A. H. et al. Structure of an endosomal signaling GPCR-G protein-β-arrestin megacomplex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 1123–1131 (2019).
50. Heng, J. et al. Function and dynamics of the intrinsically disordered carboxyl terminus of β2 adrenergic receptor. Nat. Commun. 14, 2005 (2023).
51. Casiraghi, M. et al. Structure and dynamics determine G protein coupling specificity at a class A GPCR. Sci. Adv. 11, eadq3971 (2025).
52. Denisov, I. G., Grinkova, Y. V., Lazarides, A. A. & Sligar, S. G. Directed self-assembly of monodisperse phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs with controlled size. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3477–3487 (2004).
53. Chai, Z. et al. Visualizing proteins in human cells at near-physiological concentrations with sensitive 19F NMR chemical tags. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202300318 (2023).
54. Ye, L., Eps, N. V., Zimmer, M., Ernst, O. P. & Prosser, R. S. Activation of the A2A adenosine G-protein-coupled receptor by conformational selection. Nature 533, 265–268 (2016).
55. Maharana, J. et al. Structural snapshots uncover a key phosphorylation motif in GPCRs driving β-arrestin activation. Mol. Cell 83, 2091–2107.e7 (2023).
56. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
57. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
58. Sanchez-Garcia, R. et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 4, 874 (2021).
59. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
60. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
61. Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).
62. Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).
63. Latorraca, N. R. et al. How GPCR phosphorylation patterns orchestrate arrestin-mediated signaling. Cell 183, 1813–1825.e18 (2020).
64. Hess, B. P-LINCS: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116–122 (2008).
65. Hopkins, C. W., Le Grand, S., Walker, R. C. & Roitberg, A. E. Long-time-step molecular dynamics through hydrogen mass repartitioning. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1864–1874 (2015).
Metrics
DOI:
Submission ID:
Downloads
Posted
Versions
- 2026-08-29 (2)
- 2026-04-12 (1)
How to Cite
Download Citation
Declaration of Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests to disclose.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.