Preprint / Version 1

A Dual-Boundary-Tracking Finite Element Method for the Lamm Equation in Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation

This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review.

Authors

    Chengshi Zeng,  
    Chengshi Zeng
    • Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University
    Xinqi Gong,  
    Xinqi Gong
    • School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China
    Wenqi Li
    Wenqi Li
    • Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University
Categories
Keywords
Analytical ultracentrifugation; Sedimentation velocity; Lamm equation; Finite element method; Nonuniform grid; Active-node selection

Abstract

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is widely used to characterize the size distributions of proteins and other biological macromolecules. Quantitative analysis of sedimentation velocity data requires numerical solution of the finite-column Lamm equation, with adequate resolution of the migrating sedimentation boundary and, where relevant, the bottom back-diffusion region. Computational efficiency is therefore important, particularly because sedimentation-velocity analysis can require repeated solution of the Lamm equation during parameter estimation and distribution analysis. A dual-boundary-tracking finite element method (DBTFEM) is developed that combines a fixed, physically informed nonuniform radial grid with prediction-assisted dynamic selection of active nodes. The migrating sedimentation-boundary and bottom regions are retained as two coupled active blocks, while concentrations in the masked solution plateau are reconstructed analytically. This formulation concentrates the numerical solve on dynamically relevant regions of the radial domain while retaining the underlying finite element framework. The method is evaluated using six ideal, non-interacting sedimentation cases spanning different transport regimes and is compared with high-resolution numerical reference solutions. DBTFEM reproduces the interior concentration profiles accurately while substantially reducing the number of active spatial degrees of freedom in cases where the sedimentation and bottom regions remain sufficiently separated. Separate comparisons of grid allocation and active-node masking show that the benefit of the nonuniform grid is profile dependent, with the largest improvements obtained for steep sedimentation boundaries, whereas broader profiles exhibit accuracy comparable to that obtained with conventional uniform grids. Overall, DBTFEM provides an efficient finite element framework for finite-column Lamm equation simulation by combining physically informed spatial resolution with dynamic reduction of the active solution space.

References

[1] D. A. Yphantis, Equilibrium ultracentrifugation of dilute solutions, Biochemistry 3 (3) (1964) 297–317. doi:10.1021/bi00891a003.

[2] T. Svedberg, K. O. Pedersen, The Ultracentrifuge, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1940.

[3] H. Fujita, Mathematical Theory of Sedimentation Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1962.

[4] P. Schuck, Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation: Discrete Species and Size-Distributions of Macromolecules and Particles, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2016.

[5] O. Lamm, Die differentialgleichung der ultrazentrifugierung, Arkiv för matematik, astronomi och fysik 21B (2) (1929) 1–4.

[6] P. Schuck, Sedimentation analysis of noninteracting and self-associating solutes using numerical solutions to the Lamm equation, Biophysical Journal 75 (3) (1998) 1503–1512. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74069-X.

[7] K. E. van Holde, W. O. Weischet, Boundary analysis of sedimentation-velocity experiments with monodisperse and paucidisperse solutes, Biopolymers 17 (6) (1978) 1387–1403. doi:10.1002/bip.1978.360170602.

[8] W. F. Stafford, Boundary analysis in sedimentation transport experiments: a procedure for obtaining sedimentation coefficient distributions using the time derivative of the concentration profile, Analytical Biochemistry 203 (2) (1992) 295–301. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(92)90316-Y.

[9] P. Schuck, Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling, Biophysical Journal 78 (3) (2000) 1606–1619. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-0.

[10] P. H. Brown, P. Schuck, Macromolecular size-and-shape distributions by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation, Biophysical Journal 90 (12) (2006) 4651–4661. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.081372.

[11] E. Brookes, W. Cao, B. Demeler, A two-dimensional spectrum analysis for sedimentation velocity experiments of mixtures with heterogeneity in molecular weight and shape, European Biophysics Journal 39 (3) (2010) 405–414. doi:10.1007/s00249-009-0413-5.

[12] W. Cao, B. Demeler, Modeling analytical ultracentrifugation experiments with an adaptive space-time finite element solution of the lamm equation, Biophysical Journal 89 (3) (2005) 1589–1602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.061135.

[13] P. H. Brown, P. Schuck, A new adaptive grid-size algorithm for the simulation of sedimentation velocity profiles in analytical ultracentrifugation, Computer Physics Communications 178 (2) (2008) 105–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2007.08.012.

[14] J. Liu, C. Chen, A characteristic finite element method with local mesh refinements for the lamm equation in analytical ultracentrifugation, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 25 (2) (2009) 292–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20344.

[15] M. Dishon, G. H. Weiss, D. A. Yphantis, Numerical solutions of the lamm equation. i. numerical procedure, Biopolymers 4 (4) (1966) 449–455.

[16] J.-M. Claverie, H. Dreux, R. Cohen, Sedimentation of generalized systems of interacting particles. i. solution of systems of complete lamm equations, Biopolymers 14 (8) (1975) 1685–1700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1975.360140811.

[17] B. Demeler, H. Saber, Determination of molecular parameters by fitting sedimentation data to finite-element solutions of the lamm equation, Biophysical Journal 74 (1) (1998) 444–454. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77802-6.

[18] W. Huang, Y. Ren, R. D. Russell, Moving mesh methods based on moving mesh partial differential equations, Journal of Computational Physics 113 (2) (1994) 279–290. doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1135.

[19] W. Cao, B. Demeler, Modeling analytical ultracentrifugation experiments with an adaptive space-time finite element solution for multicomponent reacting systems, Biophysical Journal 95 (1) (2008) 54–65. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.123950.

[20] J. Crank, P. Nicolson, A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 43 (1) (1947) 50–67. doi:10.1017/S0305004100023197.

[21] C. A. Brautigam, Using Lamm-equation modeling of sedimentation velocity data to determine the kinetic and thermodynamic properties of macromolecular interactions, Methods 54 (1) (2011) 4–15. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.12.029.

[22] P. Schuck, B. Demeler, Direct sedimentation analysis of interference optical data in analytical ultracentrifugation, Biophysical Journal 76 (1999) 2288–2296. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77384-4.

[23] S. Mortezazadeh, B. Demeler, Systematic noise removal from analytical ultracentrifugation data with UltraScan, European Biophysics Journal 52 (4-5) (2023) 203–213. doi:10.1007/s00249-023-01631-6.

Metrics

Views: 33
Downloads: 6

Downloads

Posted

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Zeng, C., Gong, X., & Li, W. (2026). A Dual-Boundary-Tracking Finite Element Method for the Lamm Equation in Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation. LangTaoSha Preprint Server. https://doi.org/10.65215/LTSpreprints.2026.09.23.000349

Download Citation

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests to disclose.